Jump to content

User:Winhunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


Articles I...

[edit]

Created

[edit]

Expanded significantly

[edit]

My other accounts

[edit]

My bookmarks

[edit]
Wikipedia

Wikipedia

[edit]
Category

Category

[edit]
Misc

Misc

[edit]
Tools

Tools

[edit]
Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 34
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 50
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 40
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 13
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 91
Requested RD1 redactions 5
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 21
Open sockpuppet investigations 83
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]

CSD / PRODs

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 12
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 2
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 0
Other candidates 7
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 9 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 58 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]
Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Marc Elias

[edit]

Reason: High levels of vandalism. Marc Elias is a progressive voting rights and elections attorney. This page is intentionally being targeted by people who oppose his politics. They are misleading readers regarding Donald Trump's 2020 election loss to Joe Biden and spreading disinformation about Trump associates’ connections to Russian officials and interests. This page needs to be fact checked by serious fact checkers and protected from vandals. 2600:8805:250C:3200:BD90:3AAA:4171:CA5C (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:39, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

+1 Reason: High levels of vandalism and false information. The 2016 Trump campaign was linked to Russian officials: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/connections-trump-putin-russia-ties-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868/. Attempts to add context were reverted by other user(s). Marc Elias has many followers on social media, and this page could be used to intentionally spread falsehoods. पर्वत चोटी (talk) 02:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For now it looks like the editors have things under control. I have no doubt that this page could be a target, but we don't pre-emptively protect pages. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Nuri Şahin

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism/edit warring by IPs from Malaysia and Turkey since end of December. Despite heroic efforts by an editor to revert these, there were so many bad IP edits that the article still has subtle remnants. Edit warring/vandalism done by at least 3 different IPs from 2 countries so can't just block a single one unfortunately. AncientWalrus (talk) 03:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see two actual reverts this month. The problems you describe might be better dealt with by reverting to a version predating those edits entirely and adding to it anything you think the IPs introduced that was worthwhile. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

chhaava

[edit]

Reason: This movie is based on historical novel, I want to protect page to prevent incorrect information. Kiranpawar3210 (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Question: We don't preemptively protect pages. Is there disruption now? What type and by what users? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Shaw, Berkshire

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 01:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Done for the bot again. Swatjester, you need to use the RfPP templates, or the bot would not archive the request. El_C 04:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Lolong (TV series)

[edit]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 10:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. When few if any of them seem to be reverted, it's hard to see that there's a problem. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Sanctuary city

[edit]

Reason: Vandalism and current controversial topic Mechanical Keyboarder (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing it yet. I will add a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Exodus (Uris novel)

[edit]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 00:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, relevant to the topic but hardly a nexus to the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. BilCat (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 01:31, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:35, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Done for the bot. El_C 04:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America

[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to Israeli-Arab conflict, sees some edit warring. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Amir Ohana

[edit]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. recent vandalism by ip users, and is a contentious article, as it's linked to the Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 02:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Offshore drilling

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of "Gulf of America" by new users. Jfire (talk) 02:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Lauren Handy

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: vandalism, page has increased attention due to recent pardon. Attempts to replace the loaded term 'abortionist' (a term specifically discouraged by MOS:NEO) with the neutral 'abortion provider' are being edit warred by IP addresses. FactsheetPete (talk) 03:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
    Already protected by administrator Acroterion. for ten days. Left CTOPS notice on talk per WP:CT/AB. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Dragon Age: The Veilguard

[edit]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting WP:ECP to stop an edit war until the RfC (hopefully) resolves the issues. Sariel Xilo (talk) 03:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of the remaining protection, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the RfC establishes clear consensus it can be lifted. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Australia Day

[edit]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism likely to continue over the next few days in the lead up to Australia Day (26 January) Cabrils (talk) 03:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
    Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. atop the existing indef PC. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
    Semi-protection should not be used as a preemptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred (so this is inconsistent with the Protection Policy WP:PP). In-addition, 6 months is also excessive. The article is already very hostile to new users with the permanent pending changes protection (which in itself, is meant to be used very rarely and doesn't seem justified either). So, rather than just make a summary decision, you should justify why it has been done and provide evidence for it, and explain why the length of protection time was selected. 185.218.127.37 (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Teahouse

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Vancouver Canucks

[edit]

Reason: IPs repeatitly vandalizing the article GoodDay (talk) 04:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Pragyan International University

[edit]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Recent repeated disruptive editing Cabrils (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Chase Strangio

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent misgendering and vandalism of a trans BLP. Requesting as a WP:GENSEX enforcement action. Funcrunch (talk) 05:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

San Jose Sharks

[edit]

Reason: IPs vandalizing article GoodDay (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Foundational Black American

[edit]

Reason: I am writing to respectfully request the removal of the edit protection on the "Foundational Black Americans" page. I believe that the current state of the page does not accurately represent the term and may inadvertently mislead readers.

Issue at Hand:

When searching for "Foundational Black Americans," the page redirects to an individual, which does not provide a definition or proper context of the term. This is concerning because:

Misrepresentation: "Foundational Black Americans" refers to a lineage of Black Americans whose ancestors were enslaved in the United States and have developed a distinct cultural heritage over generations. It is not a term beholden to any single person or leader.

Ethnogenesis and Cultural Significance: Black Americans have undergone a unique process of ethnogenesis, evolving from labels such as "Negro" and "Colored" to "African American," and now embracing "Foundational Black Americans" to acknowledge their specific historical and cultural identity.

Potential Misinformation: Redirecting to an individual's page may contribute to misinformation and does not align with Wikipedia's commitment to providing neutral and accurate information.

Request:

I kindly request that the edit protection be lifted to allow for collaborative efforts in:

Creating a Dedicated Page: Developing a comprehensive article that defines "Foundational Black Americans" as a lineage, supported by reliable sources.

Ensuring Accuracy and Neutrality: Providing readers with accurate information that reflects the collective heritage and contributions of Foundational Black Americans without unintended bias.

Commitment to Wikipedia's Standards:

I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. My intention is to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia and enhance the quality of information available to the public.

Conclusion:

Thank you for considering my request. I believe that updating the page to accurately reflect the term will greatly benefit those seeking information on this important aspect of American history and culture.

I look forward to your response and the opportunity to contribute to this article. 2601:983:4600:7230:8D69:264C:225A:3C55 (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Gangwar_(surname)

[edit]

Reason: I would like to request the unprotection of the Gangwar surname Wikipedia page. Currently, the page is semi-protected, which limits editing to more experienced editors, but this has hindered efforts to improve the page. The page lacks crucial information about the Gangwar clan and its historical background, including details from Vedic texts and other historical references.

As the Gangwar clan's history is deeply rooted in Vedic literature and other historical texts, it requires the expertise of scholars who are familiar with these sources to update the page. Normal editors may not fully grasp the significance of these references, and the semi-protection of the page could delay the process of incorporating the necessary academic and historical context.

It is important to include information about the Gangwar clan's regional distributions, its connections to other communities, and its role in historical events to improve the page’s accuracy and quality. Additionally, updating the page with proper citations and references from respected sources will greatly enhance the credibility of the article.

I respectfully request that the page be unprotected so that scholars and experts can contribute to the article and provide a more comprehensive and accurate account of the Gangwar surname and its historical context.

Thank you for your time and consideration. 4rju9 (talk) 04:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel

[edit]

The tile of this article should be changed from "October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel" to "October 7 Hamas-led Genocide on Israel".

There is numerous support for this change:

  • On October 7, 2023, Hamas waged the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust — slaughtering babies, committing sexual violence, burning whole villages, and taking over 200 people hostage. In total, Hamas murdered over 1,000 Jews, in multiple locations.
  • Various legal experts and genocide studies scholars argue that the 10/7 attack was a genocide as the victims were targeted for their Israeli-Jewish identity.
  • A legal complaint that Hamas committed genocide on 10/7 is currently pending before the ICC.
  • ICC issued arrest warrants for Hamas leaders alleging war crimes
  • Hamas killed more Jews on 10/7 than any other massacre since the Holocaust.
  • Hamas has made repeated statements of it's intent to eradicate the local Jewish population to reclaim "their land" both before and after 10/7 the attack. It was their stated intention for the attack to kill as many Israeli Jews as possible and steal their land.
  • Hamas's previous governing charter including language that has been characterized as incitement to genocide and, according to several commentators, "mandates the killing of Jews".
  • Hamas' official spokesperson promised to commit 10/7 "again and again and again."
  • Hamas official stated that Hamas will carry out attacks over and over again "until Israel is annihilated"
  • Various publications have called October 7 a "genocidal massacre"


The above is all supported by multiple sources. Here are some:

https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/hamas-official-vows-repeat-attacks-on-israel-this-is-our-legal-right-196999237771

https://web.archive.org/web/20240124055724/https://engelsbergideas.com/notebook/hamas-genocidal-massacre-on-october-7-has-deep-historical-roots/

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2023/10/hamas-covenant-israel-attack-war-genocide/675602/

https://web.archive.org/web/20240311111155/https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/hamas-intending-nothing-less-than-a-second-holocaust-niall-ferguson/video/248ab4e66a7ed0b5ac3180537e065024

https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-bereaved-israeli-families-bring-icc-war-crime-genocide-complaint-against-hamas/

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20231103-israeli-families-bring-war-crime-complaint-to-icc-lawyer

https://www.dw.com/en/october-7-hamas-attacks-on-israel-a-year-later/a-70399696

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/hamas-october-7-attack-repeat-israel-annihilated-ghazi-hamad/

https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/16/middleeast/israel-hamas-gaza-war-crimes-international-law-explainer-intl/index.html

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/honest-voice-israel

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-and-hamas-officials-for-war-crimes 

Apndrew (talk) 02:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done. This isn't an edit request, it's a move request (see WP:RM), and not the right place to discuss it. If you can find an extended confirmed editor who participates on the talk page who agrees that replacing "attack" with "genocide" would pass a WP:RM discussion, then go right ahead. I don't think it would pass, even if you find a few sources that refer to it this way, more can be found that refer to it as "attack". ~Anachronist (talk) 03:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Message box (request) 2025-01-07 21:25 Cascade-protected from Main Page (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-11-16: "restore"
Module:Disambiguation (request) 2025-01-18 20:46 Fully protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2023-09-01: "Upping to full protection as now used by Module:Pagetype"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
14 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-12-29 20:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-01-06 03:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:IPA/data (request) 2025-01-12 14:40 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Module:Infobox military conflict (request) 2025-01-12 21:19 Template-protected (log) Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-10-08: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Infobox military conflict/styles.css (request) 2025-01-12 21:19 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2019-07-02: "High-risk template or module (more info)"
Template:Db-meta (request) 2025-01-15 03:05 Template-protected (log) Modified by NeilN on 2015-11-18: "per request"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-01-15 19:22 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Wikipedia:WikiProject/Popular pages config.json (request) 2025-01-17 19:02 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2024-09-28: "protect at TE level"
Template:Doi (request) 2025-01-18 19:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Jo-Jo Eumerus on 2016-08-18: "Highly visible template: Protecting admin inactive, no need for high protection given the only moderately high usage"
Template:Authority control (request) 2025-01-19 15:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:WikiProject Yugoslavia (request) 2025-01-23 15:46 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox song contest national year (request) 2025-01-23 18:55 Template-protected (log) Modified by CT Cooper on 2015-03-01: "Merging has increased use, so upping protection to template editors only."
Template:League icon (request) 2025-01-23 22:40 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Wikipedia:WikiProject/Hot articles config.json (request) 2025-01-24 02:34 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2024-09-29: ""
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Ojsyork

[edit]

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Needforname

[edit]

I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed.

Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required.

Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ahola .O

[edit]

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)

(Non-administrator comment) You are currently not adding to the "workload of new page patrollers", in fact, your creations need to be watched closely. Not when I specifically told you here that the pieces you presented to inquire about Bobo Ajudua are thrash and nonsensical and told you to focus elsewhere instead of on an article that has been deleted several times. Yet, you went ahead to create it, and now, it has been deleted again? via AfD. And this? Your creations need to be watched and that is what the NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User:SDGB1217

[edit]

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User:C1K98V

[edit]

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Mbdfar

[edit]

330+ article creations with zero deletions. Have run into this editor's creations in New Page Review and do not have to do repairs; infoboxes, categories, wikilinks, short descriptions, talk pages, etc. are all in place. This editor does not need to be in the new pages feed. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Walco1

[edit]

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

User:S-Aura

[edit]

I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards.

I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:TheTechie

[edit]

I would like this right to be granted to my alternative accounts, TheTechie-alt and TheTechie-mobile, as I am far past autoconfirmed on my main account. If you reply here, please ping me. Thanks, TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot talk 22:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Yes, but my alts don't. thetechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 23:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
The bot can't read context. I'll look into it. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 00:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done for thirty days on both. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 00:17, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:TheTechie

[edit]

I would like this right to be granted to my alternative accounts, TheTechie-alt and TheTechie-mobile, as I am far past extended confirmed on my main account. If you reply here, please ping me. Thanks, TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response): This user already has the "extendedconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot talk 22:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Yes but my alts don't. thetechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 23:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done. SilverLocust 💬 04:45, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:TheSlumPanda

[edit]

I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Your recent contributions to Talk:Sinsinwar and User_talk:Ratnahastin/Archive_3#h-Please_do_some_research_before_removing_anything.-20250118173800 don't inspire confidence in me about your understanding of our sourcing policies (and/or ability to maintain a neutral POV when editing WP:IPA topics). On that basis itself, I'm inclined to mark this as {{not done}}, however, I'll let other folks weigh in. Sohom (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Taabii

[edit]

Hey, I would like to apply for the NPR rights. As I have created more than 50 pages and I'm actively involved in reviewing drafts since last week of December 2024, you can check my reviewed articles here and the articles I putted up for deletion can be seen here. My primary focus are the articles related to Women, Politics, India, Poetry, Writers and Indian activists. I do sometime revert bad faith edits. I will contribute to the Wikipedia with NPR rights, same as I have contributed through the AFC Reviewer rights. Thanks and Regards. Taabii (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done (till 21 Mar 2025) Sohom (talk) 03:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Sundostund

[edit]
Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at the near-permanent New Pages Feed backlog, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the relevant content policies and guidelines, especially when it comes to NPOV and BLP. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. As for my own record, I have created over 600 articles so far, with few deleted. I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:BryceM2001

[edit]

I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ali Beary

[edit]

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User:TrueMoriarty

[edit]

My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Sophisticatedevening

[edit]

Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Sundostund

[edit]

Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at PendingChanges, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the criteria for its use, especially in regard to BLP and countering vandalism. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. Additionally, I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions, and finally – as for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

User:W.andrea

[edit]

To review changes on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. — W.andrea (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Cmrc23

[edit]

Hello, I was temporarily granted rollback permissions to see how I do, and they are due to expire on the 27th. I believe I have been diligent and careful with this permission, and I only use it when necessary. I always warn users and I create discussions on article talk pages where necessary. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 14:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Pppery (expires 18:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 14:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
@Cmrc23: It looks like you're using generic rollback even on edits that aren't obvious vandalism (where vandalism is defined as being "deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia") or other categories of rollback that don't need an explanatory edit summary. For example, while removing a reference might be vandalism, it could also be based on good-faith belief that the source is unreliable. Similarly, this rollback doesn't seem to be of obvious vandalism. Going forward, would you include the reason in the edit summary when reverting any edits that don't fall into one of criteria 1–5 at WP:ROLLBACKUSE? SilverLocust 💬 18:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I was a little hasty with those two in particular, but I will make sure. I presumed my warning on their talk page was enough, but I try to not use it when it's not necessary (again, was hasty there, apologise) Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 19:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done. Extended by 1 month. SilverLocust 💬 04:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Footballnerd2007

[edit]

I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements.

Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting.

Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:WikiGiancarloC2

[edit]

I am requesting permission to access the template editor. I intend to modify Template:Infobox sports rivalry to add a field for the most points scored in a game within the Infobox. I believe this addition would be beneficial for NFL rivalry pages, as it would highlight the highest-scoring game between the teams. If I am unable to obtain permission, I would appreciate it if someone else could assist with this modification. WikiGiancarloC2 (talk) 23:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 336 days and has 57 edits in the template and module namespaces. — MusikBot talk 23:30, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
@WikiGiancarloC2: That template is only semi-protected, so you already have the necessary permissions to edit it. If there are template-protected pages you would like to edit, please make your changes to the sandbox version of the template (such as Template:Infobox sports rivalry/sandbox) and then make an edit request on the template's talk page.  Not done. SilverLocust 💬 04:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 38
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 21
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 692
    Templates for deletion 110
    Categories for deletion 454
    Wikipedia files for discussion 139
    All redirects for discussion 376
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 11
    Possible copyright violations 23
    All articles proposed for deletion 223
    All files proposed for deletion 8
    Unsorted AfD debates 0
    All files with the same name on Commons 9
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 492
    Unknown copyright status 36
    Unknown source 22
    No non-free use rationale 2
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 31

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,273
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 448
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,279
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,653 0.5
    All articles needing rewrite 6,075 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,336 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 40,399 0.58

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,277 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 538,706 7.76
    All articles lacking sources 69,502 1
    All unreferenced BLPs 28 0
    All articles needing additional references 477,743 6.88
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,650 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,674 1.52
    All articles with dead external links 294,875 4.25

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 135 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 18 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,242 0.02
    All articles to be split 830 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 8 -
    Stub categories 19,291 -
    All uncategorized pages 809 0.01
    All orphaned articles 54,375 0.78
    All articles needing copy edit 2,322 0.03
    All articles with style issues 19,242 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,769 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,569 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 410
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,086
    All accuracy disputes 15,768
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 0
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 3
    All articles to be expanded 65,958

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    [edit]

    Hong Kong

    [edit]
    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    [edit]
    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Winhunter&oldid=1190483781"